Psychological approaches to mental health rely primarily on a medical model of assessment, diagnosis, and treatment, which reacts to symptom presentation, affect, and behavior. This approach is limited in that it neither demonstrates a reduction in the rates of mental illness nor prevents future mental health problems in those previously treated. A significant 11-year gap exists between the onset of symptoms and intervention in the current model (National Alliance on Mental Illness, 2021). Furthermore, individuals with preventable physical illnesses are more likely to experience mental health problems, and evidence for treating multimorbidities is limited, compounding the issues of a single-disease response model (Barnett et al., 2012). A comprehensive thematic analysis of research on wellbeing for the application of preventive mental health practices could not be identified, signaling a critical gap. This paper introduces The 5-Elements of Systemic Wellbeing Framework, a conceptual model developed from a reflexive thematic analysis of over 2000 research studies and expert interviews. The analysis identified five core themes of wellbeing (Secure, Regulated, Valued, Decided, Related), each supported by evidence from 36 or more credible resources. Within each theme, twelve subfactors with the strongest evidence were organized into two subcategories: six internal (personal) and six external (environmental) factors. This structure provides a comprehensive, evidence-informed definition of wellbeing designed to serve as a launch point for the systemic prevention of mental health conditions and the promotion of wellbeing as a proactive solution. This is presented as a conceptual framework with limitations in that its application and outcomes are yet to be empirically examined on a large scale.

The prevailing reactive, medical model of mental healthcare is insufficient to address the rising prevalence of mental illness and the significant social and economic costs associated with it. A paradigm shift toward proactive, systemic prevention is urgently needed. This paper introduces the EQUIP model (Examine, Quantify, Unite, Inquire, Plan), a socioecological framework for applied preventive mental health. Grounded in principles of public health, systems theory, and positive psychology, EQUIP provides a structured, iterative process for communities and organizations to move from reactive treatment to proactive wellbeing promotion. The model begins by examining social and structural vulnerabilities (Examine), followed by measuring population wellbeing using the evidence-based 5-Elements of Systemic Wellbeing Framework (Quantify). It then guides the formation of a diverse stakeholder task force (Unite), facilitates a deep, appreciative inquiry into local context and strengths (Inquire), and culminates in a scaffolded, participatory action plan (Plan). The EQUIP model offers a scalable, data-driven, and human-centered approach to architecting environments that buffer stress, build resilience, and foster the conditions for communities to thrive. The systems evaluation and change process is conducted within a fully automated software tool, the MindArchHealth Automation Pathway (MAP).

Our global mental health situation is currently inadequate. We've mostly relied on teaching people directly about mental health, which is good, but it's slow and hard to spread that approach to everyone who needs it. So, what if there was a different way, a more subtle one, to help people feel better mentally -just by changing up their daily surroundings?

At its heart, environmental conditioning for mental health is about designing our physical and digital spaces to gently guide individuals toward enhanced well-being. This method diverges significantly from direct instruction, which demands active learning and conscious cognitive effort.

Across campuses nationwide, the escalating prevalence of mental health disorders among students represents a significant and persistent systemic challenge.

The common narrative surrounding student mental health often assumes that stress and adversity indicate something is wrong with students and that they need to be "fixed." However, this perspective fails to recognize the normalcy of stressors in college life and the crucial role institutions play in fostering resilience rather than pathologizing challenges. The Okanagan Charter and network of Health Promoting Campuses champion an ecosystemic view of mental health, emphasizing the institution’s responsibility in shaping an environment that nurtures students' well-being and success.

At the same time, growing awareness around mental health has led to reduced stigma and greater use of counseling services, which is a meaningful step forward. The growing visibility of mental health concerns has sparked this positive shift and, naturally, colleges respond to this demand through counseling. However, relying solely on clinical interventions positions mental health as an individual problem to be treated, rather than a system issue to be prevented. To move forward, institutions must take proactive steps to create environments that support resilience.

The challenge of achieving academic excellence within higher education is often dual-sided. While the achievements of high-performing students, particularly those recognized by prestigious organizations and honor societies, are celebrated for their achievements, a closer look reveals a complex connection between academic success and overall well-being. These students, destined to have successful futures, deal with unique circumstances and challenges that demand a more thorough understanding of their needs. A framework that acknowledges the link between mental health and academic performance is essential to provide a foundation for these hardworking students to flourish. Furthermore, research demonstrates a strong correlation between psychological well-being and academic achievement, emphasizing the need for a thorough and comprehensive approach (Mustafa et al., 2020).

First-generation college students make up over half of undergraduate students in the United States, yet their graduation rate is significantly lower than their peers – only 24% earn a degree, compared to 59% of their continuing-generation counterparts. This disparity is largely driven by the lack of resources and guidance available to help them navigate higher education successfully. Given that a college degree opens doors to better job opportunities and greater civic engagement, it is essential for institutions to implement systemic changes that support first-generation students’ success.

Wilches, N., Dominguez, G., & Khan, M. (2025). Wellbeing Framework Study: Protective Factors and Mental Health. This study explored mental health through a preventative lens, using the 5-Elements of Systemic Wellbeing Framework (secure, regulated, valued, decided, related). Two consecutive surveys with 60 questions were administered to 424 participants recruited via online platforms, flyers, and peer networks. The results highlighted "Decided" and "Related" as strong elements, while "Regulated" and "Secure" were areas of vulnerability. The study also found potential disparities across gender, race, and childhood income. The key predictive goal, "Increase Security By Improving Equity," suggests that a sense of security and fair treatment are crucial for mental wellbeing. The findings underscore the importance of proactive interventions and addressing systemic barriers to promote mental health.

The importance of our environment’s impact on our mental health is essential to consider, especially in higher education. Faculty set the tone for a healthy classroom environment, making it essential to prioritize faculty wellbeing to support students in higher education. With mental health issues increasing in college campuses, faculty members are on the front lines of student mental health.  Considering that “faculty are in a position to witness the demeanor of students, week in and week out” it is evident that faculty members are a large component of students' lives. 

College students face a variety of mental health challenges. There are nine vulnerabilities in particular that increase the risk of developing mental health or behavioral disorders. These vulnerabilities include risky behavior, serious life events, household dysfunction, learning and development problems, abuse, economic disadvantage, chronic illness, poor access to support, and discrimination. By understanding these vulnerabilities, we can work to create a more supportive campus environment and help students thrive.